<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>keeping simple &#187; rackable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yodaiken.com/tag/rackable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yodaiken.com</link>
	<description>Systems software technology and business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 18:30:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization versus Physicalization</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2009/04/virtualization-versus-physicalization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.yodaiken.com/2009/04/virtualization-versus-physicalization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpu design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rackable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Data on the overhead of virtualization is hard to come by. Rackable proposes an interesting alternative that they call physicalization. I wonder whether the CPU is the most important resource to multiplex and I remain totally puzzled by the motivation &#8230; <a href="http://www.yodaiken.com/2009/04/virtualization-versus-physicalization/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Data on the overhead of virtualization is hard to come by. Rackable proposes an interesting alternative that they call <a title="rackable unvirtual" href="http://www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/012209_Rackable_Intros_Physicalization_Hardware" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/012209_Rackable_Intros_Physicalization_Hardware?referer=');">physicalization</a>. I wonder whether the CPU is the most important resource to multiplex and I remain totally puzzled by the motivation of Intel/AMD in this area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.yodaiken.com/2009/04/virtualization-versus-physicalization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

