<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for keeping simple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yodaiken.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yodaiken.com</link>
	<description>Systems software technology and business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:41:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why computers are more and more devices for generating heat from electricity by Zeljko</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2011/07/why-computers-are-more-and-more-devices-for-generating-heat-from-electricity/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeljko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=1174#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>I do systems software, also at very low level (TLB, and interrupts routing, and ... &quot;root mode&quot; too ... ).
I track you - since the time I discovered your &quot;Against priority inheritance&quot; (also, an experience of mine own), and then this &quot;keeping simple&quot;
I also share your stance that I don&#039;t understand virtualization hype, in general, and Intel&#039;s stake in it, in general, ... and equivalence of VM and (a method of) &quot;guaranteed security&quot; ...
Just wanted to share with you my admiration for you staying the sane way, in consistent big picture of what the computing means and is, and what is just technical vehicle to have it done in indefinitely simple, reliable, ever satisfying and enjoying endeavour 
(or, simply said: effective, productive, efficient) that people take,
always in comparison, or relative to, other sound endeavours throughout cultures and histories ...
A real enigma I cannot answer is still (after 50+ years) present crude division of hardware and software, an amazing separation (in corporations businesses, in job descriptions, in college curricula, ...) that creates suboptimal global solutions and poorly understood systems,
after all years of computers - and, now, it broils down to kWh and the proofs of lowering the global cost minimum including the number of (someone&#039;s but not everyone&#039;s) kWh - amazing, isn&#039;t it ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do systems software, also at very low level (TLB, and interrupts routing, and &#8230; &#8220;root mode&#8221; too &#8230; ).<br />
I track you &#8211; since the time I discovered your &#8220;Against priority inheritance&#8221; (also, an experience of mine own), and then this &#8220;keeping simple&#8221;<br />
I also share your stance that I don&#8217;t understand virtualization hype, in general, and Intel&#8217;s stake in it, in general, &#8230; and equivalence of VM and (a method of) &#8220;guaranteed security&#8221; &#8230;<br />
Just wanted to share with you my admiration for you staying the sane way, in consistent big picture of what the computing means and is, and what is just technical vehicle to have it done in indefinitely simple, reliable, ever satisfying and enjoying endeavour<br />
(or, simply said: effective, productive, efficient) that people take,<br />
always in comparison, or relative to, other sound endeavours throughout cultures and histories &#8230;<br />
A real enigma I cannot answer is still (after 50+ years) present crude division of hardware and software, an amazing separation (in corporations businesses, in job descriptions, in college curricula, &#8230;) that creates suboptimal global solutions and poorly understood systems,<br />
after all years of computers &#8211; and, now, it broils down to kWh and the proofs of lowering the global cost minimum including the number of (someone&#8217;s but not everyone&#8217;s) kWh &#8211; amazing, isn&#8217;t it &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Auragen computers remembered by Stu Green</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2006/03/auragen-computers-remembered/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 15:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yodaiken.com/?p=32#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>I too was at Auragen briefly and was one of the commuters from NYC.  It was a fantastic learning environment with substantial Unix knowledge being freely shared by folks like Anita Borg.  Unfortunately, it did not last long enough.  Doug Wells was one of the greatest sources of networking and Unix internals knowledge I have ever met.  To close the circle following Auragen&#039;s demise I joined Bell Labs and finally got to see viable fault tolerant Unix at Tandem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too was at Auragen briefly and was one of the commuters from NYC.  It was a fantastic learning environment with substantial Unix knowledge being freely shared by folks like Anita Borg.  Unfortunately, it did not last long enough.  Doug Wells was one of the greatest sources of networking and Unix internals knowledge I have ever met.  To close the circle following Auragen&#8217;s demise I joined Bell Labs and finally got to see viable fault tolerant Unix at Tandem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Corporate organization in the modern age. by Marcelo Rosa</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2010/11/corporate-organization-in-the-modern-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1177</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelo Rosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=1130#comment-1177</guid>
		<description>Great analysis: Companies always try to keep the current status quo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis: Companies always try to keep the current status quo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft by the numbers by Spudd86</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2010/06/microsoft-by-the-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudd86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 19:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=990#comment-361</guid>
		<description>The market share for Linux on servers is almost certainly severely undercounted since they ONLY count stuff like RHEL where you have a support contract involved (ie where there&#039;s some sort of &#039;sale&#039;) The problem with doing this is that that&#039;s not the only way Linux is deployed to production environments, people frequently just install debian or some other distro after downloading it themselves. (Just an example Google&#039;s entire infrastructure is missing from those market share numbers, I&#039;d say that makes them questionable) 

It looks like MS got those numbers from Gartner which wikipedia says is based on &#039;Revenue&#039; so Linux will be very underrepresented http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Servers

Netcraft says Windows and Linux are both about 41% (and Apache is almost 90%...) https://ssl.netcraft.com/ssl-sample-report//CMatch/osdv_all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The market share for Linux on servers is almost certainly severely undercounted since they ONLY count stuff like RHEL where you have a support contract involved (ie where there&#8217;s some sort of &#8216;sale&#8217;) The problem with doing this is that that&#8217;s not the only way Linux is deployed to production environments, people frequently just install debian or some other distro after downloading it themselves. (Just an example Google&#8217;s entire infrastructure is missing from those market share numbers, I&#8217;d say that makes them questionable) </p>
<p>It looks like MS got those numbers from Gartner which wikipedia says is based on &#8216;Revenue&#8217; so Linux will be very underrepresented <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Servers" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems_Servers?referer=');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Servers</a></p>
<p>Netcraft says Windows and Linux are both about 41% (and Apache is almost 90%&#8230;) <a href="https://ssl.netcraft.com/ssl-sample-report//CMatch/osdv_all" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/ssl.netcraft.com/ssl-sample-report//CMatch/osdv_all?referer=');">https://ssl.netcraft.com/ssl-sample-report//CMatch/osdv_all</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on parallel processing and bash reduce by Ole Tange</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2009/07/parallel-processing-and-bash-reduce/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>Ole Tange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=498#comment-355</guid>
		<description>GNU Parallel http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/ solves a different class of problems than map-reduce. For bashscripts it is very useful, though.

See the basic usage on http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlXDtd_pRaY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GNU Parallel <a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.gnu.org/software/parallel/?referer=');">http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/</a> solves a different class of problems than map-reduce. For bashscripts it is very useful, though.</p>
<p>See the basic usage on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlXDtd_pRaY" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlXDtd_pRaY&amp;referer=');">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlXDtd_pRaY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Operating system research &#8211; 16 years perspective by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2008/10/operating-system-research-14-years-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 05:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=170#comment-354</guid>
		<description>This note has suddenly attracted a lot of attention - and there I thought OS research was over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This note has suddenly attracted a lot of attention &#8211; and there I thought OS research was over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recursion and state update and Hungarian Mathematicians by Continuing mathematician sanity thread: Boltzmann &#60; keeping simple</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2010/02/recursion-and-state-update/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Continuing mathematician sanity thread: Boltzmann &#60; keeping simple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 19:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=752#comment-134</guid>
		<description>[...] a very different one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a very different one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s engineering culture by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2008/01/googles-engineering-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 15:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/2008/01/googles-engineering-culture/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Google analytics shows a sudden spike of interest in this old story - so much so that I have been embarrassed into fixing  some typos and format problems. What&#039;s up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google analytics shows a sudden spike of interest in this old story &#8211; so much so that I have been embarrassed into fixing  some typos and format problems. What&#8217;s up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Computer Science is a failed field #2 by keeping simple &#187; Archive &#187; Peer review in the electronic age</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2010/01/why-computer-science-is-a-failed-field-2/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>keeping simple &#187; Archive &#187; Peer review in the electronic age</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=653#comment-122</guid>
		<description>[...] Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More computer science as humbug [updated with Brazil dream sequence] by keeping simple &#187; Archive &#187; Peer review in the electronic age</title>
		<link>http://www.yodaiken.com/2010/03/more-computer-science-as-humbug/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>keeping simple &#187; Archive &#187; Peer review in the electronic age</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=863#comment-121</guid>
		<description>[...] Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

