Comments for keeping simple http://www.yodaiken.com Systems software technology and business Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:19:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Recursion and state by keeping simple » Archive » Recursion and state update http://www.yodaiken.com/recursion-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-110 keeping simple » Archive » Recursion and state update Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:19:47 +0000 http://www.yodaiken.com/?page_id=362#comment-110 [...] Recursion and state [...] [...] Recursion and state [...]

]]> Comment on Computer Science as a failed discipline by Why Computer Science is a failed field #2 at keeping simple http://www.yodaiken.com/2010/01/computer-science-as-a-failed-discipline/comment-page-1/#comment-109 Why Computer Science is a failed field #2 at keeping simple Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:26:46 +0000 http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=623#comment-109 [...] mentioned the phobia against mere experimentation recently, but now I have some more fascinating glimpses into “peer review”. I have some [...] [...] mentioned the phobia against mere experimentation recently, but now I have some more fascinating glimpses into “peer review”. I have some [...]

]]> Comment on Are threads evil? (updated) by Deterministic multithreading at keeping simple http://www.yodaiken.com/2009/02/are-threads-evil/comment-page-1/#comment-102 Deterministic multithreading at keeping simple Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:00:39 +0000 http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=220#comment-102 [...] works refer to Lee’s paperwhich I discussed earlier. Nondeterministic threading is a  historical accident in computer engineering. Operating systems [...] [...] works refer to Lee’s paperwhich I discussed earlier. Nondeterministic threading is a  historical accident in computer engineering. Operating systems [...]

]]> Comment on Robin Milner and Automata theory by Process algebra (updated) at keeping simple http://www.yodaiken.com/2009/07/robin-milner-and-automata-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-100 Process algebra (updated) at keeping simple Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:32:02 +0000 http://www.yodaiken.com/?p=431#comment-100 [...] where I show how to compose classical automata and define them “abstractly” and to a complaint about the weak critique of automata theory in standard process algebra literature and also to a [...] [...] where I show how to compose classical automata and define them “abstractly” and to a complaint about the weak critique of automata theory in standard process algebra literature and also to a [...]

]]> Comment on Recursion and state by Process algebra (updated) at keeping simple http://www.yodaiken.com/recursion-and-state/comment-page-1/#comment-98 Process algebra (updated) at keeping simple Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:57:33 +0000 http://www.yodaiken.com/?page_id=362#comment-98 [...] of process algebra is below.  This relates to the Recursion and State paper and explicatory blog entry where I show how to compose classical automata and define them “abstractly” and to a [...] [...] of process algebra is below.  This relates to the Recursion and State paper and explicatory blog entry where I show how to compose classical automata and define them “abstractly” and to a [...]

]]> Comment on failure to communicate with process algebras by Process algebra at keeping simple http://www.yodaiken.com/papers-and-talks/failure-to-communicate-process-algebras-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-97 Process algebra at keeping simple Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:32:44 +0000 http://www.yodaiken.com/?page_id=384#comment-97 [...] first part of a critique of process algebra is below. There are other parts of it scattered around in some recent posts and some other issues that need [...] [...] first part of a critique of process algebra is below. There are other parts of it scattered around in some recent posts and some other issues that need [...]

]]> Comment on failure to communicate with process algebras by The source of error at keeping simple http://www.yodaiken.com/papers-and-talks/failure-to-communicate-process-algebras-draft/comment-page-1/#comment-96 The source of error at keeping simple Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:29:03 +0000 http://www.yodaiken.com/?page_id=384#comment-96 [...] I have a draft of the “process algebras considered harmful” note [...] [...] I have a draft of the “process algebras considered harmful” note [...]

]]> Comment on Microkernels and why academic OS research is boring by admin http://www.yodaiken.com/2006/05/microkernels-and-why-academic-os-research-is-boring/comment-page-1/#comment-95 admin Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:07:33 +0000 http://yodaiken.com/?p=38#comment-95 QNX has always been the exception that proves the rule - but it's not a classical microkernel. The posix process server lives in the same address space as the microkernel and combines mm, process management, and some file system work. QNX has always been the exception that proves the rule – but it’s not a classical microkernel. The posix process server lives in the same address space as the microkernel and combines mm, process management, and some file system work.

]]> Comment on Microkernels and why academic OS research is boring by iwanbk http://www.yodaiken.com/2006/05/microkernels-and-why-academic-os-research-is-boring/comment-page-1/#comment-94 iwanbk Tue, 07 Jul 2009 05:57:47 +0000 http://yodaiken.com/?p=38#comment-94 [the problem with all the “nearly ready for prime time” microkernels is that they are not real products] Hello Mr Yodaiken, How about QNX ? Cisco IOS XR based on this OS, and maybe much more another product. Thanks [the problem with all the “nearly ready for prime time” microkernels is that they are not real products]
Hello Mr Yodaiken,
How about QNX ? Cisco IOS XR based on this OS, and maybe much more another product.

Thanks

]]> Comment on Elegance shmelagance, the Le Corbusier fallacy again (rev3). by OS design at keeping simple http://www.yodaiken.com/2006/12/elegance-shmelagance-the-le-corbusier-fallacy-again/comment-page-1/#comment-93 OS design at keeping simple Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:57:19 +0000 http://yodaiken.com/?p=61#comment-93 [...] [cite] [...] [...] [cite] [...]

]]>