It’s sad that after all this time, one can look at any random article on parallel programming and find some variation of:
for i = 1 ... n create thread i do something end for
as if that was the only way to express parallel computation. This is such an awkward way of looking at problems.Â I think many problems come from the sloppy “non-determinism” of the operating systems and multi-core machines.Â One of the fewÂ interesting ideas seen in the last 20 years on parallel processing is the Google map-reduce scheme ( . But what I find impressive is bashreduce. This is really a clever trick and a great validation of the UNIX toolset design (as if it needed another validation).